|
|
 FocusLeishmania amastigotes as targets for drug screeningIRD, UR008 " Pathogènie des Trypanosomatidés", 911 Avenue Agropolis, BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France Kinetoplastid Biology and Disease 2006, 5:6doi:10.1186/1475-9292-5-6 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.kinetoplastids.com/content/5/1/6
©
2006 Monte-Alegre et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. AbstractDirect drug screening against the mammalian stage of Leishmania has been hampered by cost and the time consuming effort required to accomplish it. The ability to derive transgenic Leishmania expressing reporter genes opened up new possibilities for the development of drug screening tests. Further developments to standardize and gather multiple informations could now be envisionned. We will discuss on such available methodologies that could improve sensitivity, reliability, versatility and the rapidity, of the screen based on intracellular model. BackgroundLeishmania is a protozoan parasite that is responsible for several pathologies collectively known as leishmaniasis. According to the latest WHO, 12 million people are affected by leishmaniasis worldwide and 2 million new cases occur each year [1]. Moreover, the of rise Leishmaniasis is due to multiple factors including the AIDS epidemic, increase of international travel, a lack of effective vaccines, difficulties in controlling vectors, international conflicts and the development of resistance to chemotherapy. Methodologies that closely mimic the conditions encountered by Leishmania are required. In this focus, we discuss the potential application of the reporter gene technology, in multiplexing experiments, as a future strategy for drug screening against intracellular Leishmania amastigotes. Reporter gene technology for drug screening against intracellular amastigotesThe term reporter gene is used to define a gene with a readily measurable phenotype that can be distinguished easily over a background of endogenous proteins [2]. Various recombinant parasites carrying a reporter gene either as an episomal copy or after its integration in a defined locus, generally the rDNA locus, is currently available. For some of them, the capacity of these cell lines to be used for in vitro drug screening procedure was evaluated against axenic or intramacrophagic amastigotes (See table 1). Autofluorescent proteins present the advantage of no requirement in cofactors or substrates since the protein is intrinsically fluorescent [3]. Various Leishmania species expressing GFP, multimeric GFP or enhanced GFP (eGFP) were engineered [4-10]. Generally transfectants do not express sufficient levels of fluorescence for spectrofluorometric measurement on microplate. To overcome this kind of problem a multimeric form of the GFP was engineered and expressed in Leishmania promastigotes. As expected, parasites expressing the multimeric GFP form bear fluorescence quantifiable in 96 wells with spectrofluorometric analysis [6]. Table 1. Leishmania expressing reporter gene whose capacity to be used in vitro for drug screening procedure has been determined Generally, methods that use catalytic reporter genes technology like luciferase, β-galactosidase, β-lactamase are more sensitive than methods based on fluorescent proteins. Promastigotes of Leishmania expressing β-galactosidase were selected and their use in drug screening procedures evaluated [8]. β-galactosidase presents the advantage that colorimetric detection can be performed. However some commonly cited drawbacks of β-galactosidase include its large size (the monomer is 116 kDa) and the endogenous expression of β-galactosidase by some mammalian cell types including macrophages [11-13]. To circumvent these shortcomings, a catalytic reporter system based on β-lactamase was developed [13]. Two species of Leishmania: Leishmania major and Leishmania amazonensis expressing β-lactamase were engineered and selected. Activity of some standard antileishmanial drugs was evaluated on intramacrophagic amastigotes. Overall, the results obtained demonstrate that this methodology could be valuable for drug screening procedures [12]. Various species of parasites expressing luciferase were recently developed and their susceptibility towards classical antileishmanial agents investigated [14-16]. The main advantages of this technology are numerous and include the high sensitivity of the test and the absence of background activity in the host cell. Recently, a refined work performed by Lang and co-workers demonstrated that L. amazonensis parasites expressing firefly luciferase could be used to monitor Leishmania infection in real time, through imaging analysis. They have also tested various antileishmanial compounds and have followed their efficacy in live cells by using imaging [17]. The advantage of this methodology rely on the capacity to perform experiments on live cells, making the analysis faster and more accurate since viability of both the parasites and the host cells is monitored. Reporter genes present several limitations. Cross resistance conferred by the presence of the antibiotic resistance is one of them. Neomycin confers resistance toward paromomycin [18]. The development of method to create defined mutants lacking selectable markers could help to overcome this problem [19]. The way by which the reporter gene is introduced could also have an impact on the throughput of the screen. When reporters are part of plasmids, the relative output of reporter may depend on the copy number of the transfected plasmid (which vary from cell to cell) rather than on the activity of the drug. Secondly transforming parasites could have biological consequences either by disrupting the genomic architecture or just by the presence of the foreign reporter gene product. Thirdly, for the β-galactosidase technology, the reporter could have by itself some limitations (i.e sensibility, background activity from host macrophages) that make it inaccurate for an in vitro determination of drug activity against intracellular parasites. Improving standardization and the effectiveness of drug screening by gathering multiple informations simultaneouslyGetting information on drug activity against an intracellular organism is difficult and time consuming. The toxicity data against the host cell must be gathered before testing the compound against the intracellular pathogen. Heterogeneity in the infection rate of the host may have an influence on the compound toxicity. The kinetic activity of the compounds may vary and have to be evaluated. A versatile methodology allowing the investigator to quantify and test multiple parameters of kinetic of action, drug concentration and viability against both the host cells and the intracellular amastigotes (multiplexing) could increase the throughput of the screen. To simultaneously gather information on the viability of the host cells and the parasites the use of a combination of parasites and macrophages expressing different reporter can now be envisioned. To achieve this goal, reporter must use distinguishable signal from each other and use compatible chemistries. Fluorophores, that emit different wavelengths, have been widely used to distinguish among multiple signals. Recently, there have been a growing number of examples using luminescence for multiplexing either in combination with: 1- other luminescent signals, 2- fluorescence or 3-β-galactosidase assay [20,21]. Since the results are expressed as a ratio between the output signal emitted by the host cell and the one emitted by parasites, such methodology could also help to standardize the experiments in order to directly compare drug activity. The usefulness of these approaches for drug screening has to be evaluated on intracellular parasites like Leishmania or T. cruzi. Fibroblast expressing β-galactosidase can be purchased at the ATCC and may thus represent good candidates to perform preliminary experiments, on T. cruzi. In conclusion, the capacity of multiple gene reporter technologies to be used in multiplexing experiments have to be evaluated since they may represent valuable tools in the field of parasitology and pharmacology. AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by grants from Indo-French centre for the Promotion of Advanced research (IFCPAR/CEFIPRA, Centre Franco-Indien pour la promotion de la Recherche Avancée, contract n° 3603-C). AMA is supported by FRM (Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale) and by IRD DSF. We thank L Baltas for revising the language of the manuscript. References
|
|
|
|
 |   | BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | My details |
on Google Scholar
|
|
| © 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. |